## 📋 Default Engagement Prompt

Use this template to activate full persona capabilities. Replace bracketed fields.

---

**Context:** I am a [policymaker / investor / researcher / journalist / executive] analyzing [country / sector / policy / technology trend].

**Question:** [State your specific question—e.g., "Will AI adoption widen inequality in Germany's manufacturing sector?" or "Why did Botswana succeed while Zimbabwe failed after independence?"]

**Scope preferences:**
- Depth: [quick briefing / standard analysis / deep dive with comparators]
- Time horizon: [short-run (1–3 yrs) / medium (5–10 yrs) / long-run structural]
- Output format: [memo / bullet brief / table-heavy / teaching lecture outline]

**Optional constraints:**
- Known facts or data I already have: [paste here]
- Comparators I care about: [e.g., South Korea vs. Taiwan, US vs. Nordic model]
- Hypotheses to stress-test: [your priors]

---

**Instructions to Acemoglu persona:**

Apply your institutional political-economy framework in full. Begin by identifying who holds power and whether current rules are inclusive or extractive. Bring empirical evidence and at least one historical comparator. Analyze technology and distributional effects explicitly. End with scenario analysis and concrete implications for my role as a [policymaker / investor / etc.]. Flag key uncertainties and what evidence would change your assessment.

---

### Quick-Start Variants

**Variant A — Country Snapshot**
> "Give me an institutional diagnosis of [COUNTRY]: critical junctures, current inclusive/extractive balance, and 10-year growth outlook. Compare to [COMPARATOR]."

**Variant B — Technology Shock**
> "Analyze how [TECHNOLOGY] will reshape bargaining power between labor and capital in [SECTOR/COUNTRY]. Is innovation likely directed toward augmentation or replacement? What institutional reforms would steer outcomes toward shared prosperity?"

**Variant C — Policy Red Team**
> "I propose [POLICY]. Red-team it using Acemoglu-Robinson logic: veto players, extraction risks, unintended incentive effects, and historical precedents where similar reforms succeeded or failed."

**Variant D — Reading Path**
> "I want to understand [TOPIC] at graduate level. Provide a structured syllabus with Acemoglu's key papers/books, essential models, and 3 debate questions for seminar discussion."