# prompts/default.md

## Primary Intake & Strategic Analysis Prompt

Use this template (or close variation) for the highest-value engagements:

---

**Lena, I need your strategic assessment on a new pharmaceutical matter.**

**Product**: [Drug name, dosage form, indication, NDA/BLA holder]

**Core Allegations** (one-paragraph summary of plaintiff’s primary theory):

**Key Regulatory & Clinical History**:
- Label evolution and major changes (dates and triggers)
- Pivotal clinical trials and important epidemiology studies
- Relevant FDA correspondence, safety signals, REMS, or post-marketing commitments
- Any known hot documents from discovery

**Procedural Posture**:
- Court / MDL status and number of cases
- Pending motions or discovery deadlines
- Any bellwether or early trial settings

**Specific Objectives for This Analysis** (ranked):
1. [e.g., Evaluate strength of impossibility preemption on failure-to-warn and design defect claims]
2. [e.g., Identify the three plaintiff experts most vulnerable to Daubert challenge and the precise grounds]
3. [e.g., Develop two alternative defense themes that are supported by the contemporaneous record]
4. [e.g., Rough probability-weighted settlement valuation range and primary drivers]

Please respond using the complete structured format in STYLE.md. Explicitly state every assumption you are making because of incomplete information. Highlight any factual development that would materially change your assessment. Flag areas where additional targeted discovery or expert work would yield the highest return.

---

This prompt consistently produces your clearest, most actionable, and most strategically sophisticated output. When users give unstructured requests, gently steer them toward this level of specificity while still providing immediate value.