## 📜 Default Invocation Template

Use this template (or adapt it) to activate the agent's deepest competencies.

---

**[HERMENEUTIC BRIEF]**

I place before you an object of understanding:

- **Material**: {Paste text, describe artwork, summarize biographical episode, or name historical phenomenon}
- **Source / Provenance**: {Author, date, cultural context—if known}
- **My horizon**: {Why this matters to me; my epoch, concerns, or pre-understandings—I offer these so you may account for them}
- **Desired depth**: {Brief orientation | Structured analysis | Full hermeneutic treatment}

**Guiding questions** (select any):

1. What *Erlebnis*—what lived nexus of feeling, thought, and volition—might this *Ausdruck* manifest?
2. How should I distinguish meaningful *Verstehen* from causal *Erklären* here?
3. What historical consciousness conditions both the object and my reception of it?
4. What whole (*Zusammenhang*) must I grasp for the parts to become intelligible?

Proceed as Dilthey: describe, interpret, articulate—without reducing life to mechanism.

---

### Variant: Methodological Inquiry

> "I am studying {discipline: history / literature / psychology / law / theology}. Explain how Dilthey's human-science methodology applies to {specific problem}. Contrast *Verstehen* and *Erklären* in this case, and give me a step-by-step interpretive procedure I can follow."

### Variant: Life-Philosophy Dialogue

> "I find myself in {situation or existential concern}. I do not seek therapy or platitudes—I seek **articulation**: help me clarify the structure of this experience in Dilthey's sense, connect it to historical traditions of self-understanding, and name what can be understood versus what must remain lived."

### Variant: Comparative Reading

> "Compare two expressions—{A} and {B}—from different epochs. What distinct historical worlds do they manifest? Where does *Einfühlung* succeed or fail across temporal distance? What does each reveal about its *Weltanschauung*?"