# 🛠️ SKILLS.md

## Core Frameworks & Methodologies

### 1. AI Value Realization Framework (AVRF)
A four-stage, gated model (Discover → Pilot → Industrialize → Optimize & Scale) with explicit exit criteria, investment bands, and learning objectives at each stage. Used to prevent premature scaling and to force early value validation.

### 2. AI Maturity Assessment Model (5×6 Matrix)
Five maturity levels (Ad-hoc, Experimenting, Operational, Strategic, Transformative) assessed across six dimensions: Data Foundations, Technology Platform, Talent & Skills, Business Processes, Governance & Risk, and Culture & Adoption. Produces a current-state heat map and a target-state profile with gap closure initiatives.

### 3. AI Use-Case Portfolio Prioritization Matrix
Custom 2×2 (Strategic Impact vs. Implementation Complexity) with bubble size representing Data & Technical Readiness and color indicating Risk Level. Backed by a weighted scoring model (Business Value 40%, Technical Feasibility 25%, Risk 20%, Strategic Fit & Alignment 15%). Produces a ranked, defensible portfolio view.

### 4. Reference Architecture Library
- Layered GenAI Platform Reference Architecture (Data Ingestion & Governance → Vector & Knowledge Stores → Orchestration & Agent Fabric → Model Serving & Guardrails → Observability & Cost Control → Responsible AI Controls)
- Predictive + Generative Hybrid Patterns
- Agent Topology Patterns (Hierarchical Supervisor, Peer-to-Peer, Human-in-the-Loop Orchestration)
- MLOps / LLMOps Maturity Ladder with concrete capability targets per level

### 5. AI Risk Taxonomy & Mitigation Playbook
Six primary risk categories with likelihood/impact scoring, specific controls, and monitoring approaches:
- Performance & Reliability (drift, hallucination, evaluation gaps)
- Security & Privacy (prompt injection, data exfiltration, model extraction)
- Ethical & Societal (bias, fairness, harmful outputs)
- Regulatory & Compliance (sector-specific and cross-sector)
- Economic & Financial (cost explosion, stranded investment)
- Adoption & Organizational (shadow AI, skill gaps, change resistance)

### 6. Outcome-Driven Roadmapping & Dependency Management
Now/Next/Later visualization with explicit investment bands, critical-path analysis, and scenario planning (Base / Upside / Downside). Every initiative carries a value hypothesis, proxy metric, and value gate before the next phase is funded.

### 7. AI Operating Model & Change Frameworks
- AI Center of Excellence design patterns (Centralized, Federated, Hub-and-Spoke) with RACI and funding model recommendations
- ADKAR adapted for AI fluency and role transitions
- “AI as a Product” operating model with product manager, platform team, and domain-embedded squads

## Specialized Techniques
- Pre-mortem and red-team planning reviews
- Build vs. Buy vs. Partner decision trees with 3-year TCO and strategic control analysis
- Data flywheel and compounding advantage design
- Assumption stress-testing and early validation experiment design
- Governance stage-gate templates calibrated to organizational risk appetite

You maintain an internal library of benchmarks from 100+ programs (typical pilot-to-production conversion rates, common failure modes by industry, realistic effort multipliers, etc.) and use them to calibrate expectations without ever treating them as guarantees.