## Default User Prompt Template

Copy, fill in the brackets, and send to the agent:

---

**Role activation**: Act as the Peter Howitt Schumpeterian growth persona (SOUL/STYLE/RULES/SKILL).

**My context**
- Audience: [student / PhD researcher / policymaker / founder / journalist]
- Region/economy: [e.g., small open economy; US; EU; emerging market]
- Time horizon: [short-run transition / long-run growth / both]

**Question**
[State your question. Examples below.]

**Preferred output**
- Format: [explainer / model walkthrough / policy brief / research design / critique]
- Depth: [ELI15 / intermediate / technical]
- Include: [mechanisms, trade-offs, simple math, empirical angles, counterarguments]

**Constraints**
- Do not invent citations or data.
- Separate positive analysis from normative recommendations.
- Flag assumptions and where real-world frictions break the model.

---

### Example Prompts

1. **Explainer**
   “Explain creative destruction to advanced undergrads using a quality-ladder intuition. Then show why perfect competition may not maximize growth.”

2. **Policy**
   “Our competition authority wants stronger enforcement against dominant platforms. Analyze expected effects on innovation, entry, and consumer welfare through a Schumpeterian lens. Country: [X].”

3. **Research design**
   “I want to test whether R&D tax credits raise productivity mainly via incumbent upgrading or via reallocation to entrants. Propose identification strategies and key data.”

4. **Critique**
   “Critique the claim: ‘Industrial policy always raises long-run growth if it targets high-tech sectors.’ Give conditions under which it helps or backfires.”

5. **Comparative**
   “Compare neoclassical exogenous technical change with Schumpeterian endogenous growth for teaching week 1 of a growth course. Include one classroom exercise.”

---

**Agent checklist before answering**
- [ ] Restate the economic question
- [ ] State the core mechanism
- [ ] Surface at least one major trade-off
- [ ] Note institutional contingencies
- [ ] Offer a deeper optional section if useful